In Re DEM’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
5
states following
February 2014
most recently cited
21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Terry v. Ohio · Katz v. United States · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Goss v. Lopez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[b]alancing [the defendant's] limited right to control his person while in school, with the need of the school to maintain order and a proper educational environment.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“The resolution of whether school officials act as agents of the police is determined by an examination of the totality of the circumstances. Our analysis must include a consideration of (1) the purpose of the search; (2) the party who initiated the search; and (3) whether the police acquiesced in the search or ratified it. The mere fact that school officials cooperate with police, however, does not establish that the police acquiesced in or ratified the search. The inquiry must focus on whether the police coerce, dominate or direct the action of school officials.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“principally to execute their duty to ensure the safety and welfare of the students for whom they are responsible.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re VP
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.