Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 727 F.2d 1025 - Scoggins v. Pollock

Scoggins v. Pollock’s Empirical Analysis

727 F.2d 1025 · 1984

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently November 2016 · most notably Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Beech Aircraft Corp. (1984), Molinos Valle Del Cibao, C. por A. v. Lama (2011)

14 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

1101984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)

Relies on United States v. United States Gypsum Co. · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc. · Thompson v. United States · Dussouy v. Gulf Coast Investment Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Mas v. Perry, 489 F.2d 1396 , 1399 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 842, 95 S.Ct. 74, 42 L.Ed.2d 70 (1974) (quoting Stine v. Moore, 213 F.2d 446 , 448 (5th Cir.1954)). Furthermore, a change of domicile requires”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[a] concurrent showing of (1) physical presence at the new location with (2) an intention to remain there indefinitely....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.