Narrol v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis
727 F.2d 1303 · 1984
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 11 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 2011
9 federal appellate · 11 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gold v. Secretary of Health, Education & Welfare · Smith v. Califano · Cutler v. Weinberger · Fruge v. Harris · Diabo v. Secretary of Health Education and Welfare
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“duty to probe and explore scrupulously all the relevant facts”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Poulin v. Bowen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.