New York State Association for Retarded Children Inc v. L Carey’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “UCP seeks review of the reimbursement rates it has received not pursuant to any federal statute or the consent judgment, but pursuant to its contract with the State. New York has established a procedure for administrative review of the rate making process, ... and judicial review of administrative decisions is available in New York Supreme Court under Article 78 of New York Civil Practice Law and Rules.... Thus, the principles of comity that compelled abstention in Alabama Public Service Commission v. Southern Railway Co., 341 U.S. 341 , 71 S.Ct. 762 , 95 L.Ed. 1002 (1951), and Burford v. Sun Oil Co., 319 U.S. 315 , 63 S.Ct. 1098 , 87 L.Ed. 1424 (1943), apply to this case, and the district court properly abstained, so that UCP's claims could be decided within New York's system of review.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. ANDREW H. BY IRENE H. v. Ambach