Taylor v. Maggio’s Empirical Analysis
727 F.2d 341 · 1984
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently June 2013 · most notably Koch v. Puckett (1990), Lavernia v. Lynaugh (1988)
19 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Stone v. Powell · Blackledge v. Allison · Local 408, International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. National Labor Relations Board · Boston Firefighters Union, Local 718 v. Boston Chapter, NAACP
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'to be entitled to a hearing on ineffectiveness, a habeas petitioner must allege facts which, if proved, would overcome the presumptions that trial counsel is effective and that trial conduct is the product of reasoned strategy decisions.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Rushing v. Butler · Koch v. Puckett“In order to be entitled to an evidentiary hearing before the district court, a habeas petitioner must allege facts which, if proved, would entitle him to relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bridge v. Lynaugh“an identifiable lapse on the part of counsel and an actual adverse impact on the fairness of his trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Trass v. Maggio
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.