Rubin v. Buckman’s Empirical Analysis
727 F.2d 71 · 1984
Citation profile
28 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 56 later decisions — most recently August 2009 · most notably Steel Valley Authority v. Union Switch & Signal Division (1987), Pritzker
28 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De Guinee · Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. Kroger · American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Finn · Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State Bank · Mansfield Ry Co v. Swan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Because the rule in Di Frischia is obviously in conflict with Supreme Court precedent, I agree that it should be overruled, and that our action in rejecting Di Frischia may be accomplished without the necessity of an in banc hearing.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“jurisdiction cannot be created by estoppel, even as a sanction for conduct such as that here or in Di Frischia.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if either party's bad faith is determinative of whether attorney's fees should be awarded [under Rule 11], then the parties should be given an opportunity to present appropriate submissions on that issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.