Kirby v. Donovan’s Empirical Analysis
727 F.2d 869 · 1984
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 79L · 19 U.S.C. § 2395
Relies on 20 Cal. 3d 55 - Sanchez v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board · United States v. Towns · Donovan v. Southern California Gas Co. · 23 Cal. 3d 493 - Glick v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board · Barnes v. Donovan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[Tjotal layoff” means a calendar week during which affected employers have made no work available to a covered employee and made no payment to said covered employee for time not worked, and “partial layoff” means a calendar week for which all pay received by a covered employee from affected employers is at least 10 per centum less than the layoff or vacation replacement benefit that would have been payable for that week had said covered employee suffered a total layoff____”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“An affected employee shall be eligible ... for layoff ... benefits, ... if ... said employee ... (2) is eligible for unemployment compensation benefits under the California Unemployment Insurance Code....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“was not intended to provide an alternative form of disability compensation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Mahan v. Brock
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.