Grant v. Trammell’s Empirical Analysis
727 F.3d 1006 · 2013
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Appellate journey
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Lockett v. Ohio · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“simply count[ ] up the number of errors discovered.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“if their probabilistic sum sufficiently undermines confidence in the outcome of the trial.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“they do not collectively call into question the compelling case the government put on”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.