Castro v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
727 F.3d 125 · 2013
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1229B (§ 240a of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Hernandez v. Ashcroft · Vasile v. Gonzales · Mehilli v. Gonzales · United States v. Blasini-Lluberas · Elysee v. Gonzales
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“8 U.S.C. §§ 1252 (a)(2)(B)(i), (D) ; see Castro v. Holder , 727 F.3d 125 , 128 (1st Cir. 2013) ; Santana-Medina v. Holder , 616 F.3d 49 , 52 (1st Cir. 2010).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rivera v. Sessions“attacks on the factual findings made and the balancing of factors engaged in by the”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Twum v. Barr“constitutional claims or questions of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rivera v. Sessions
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.