Torrens v. Hood’s Empirical Analysis
727 F.3d 1360 · 2013
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 110 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 527 (§ 228 of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 18 U.S.C. § 157 · 18 U.S.C. § 3057
Relies on Mroz Glatter Pa v. Mroz · Griffith v. Oles · Hunter v. United States · Englander Englander · in Re: Optical Technologies, Inc. v. Larson Pharmacy Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“sits as a second court of review and thus examines independently the factual and legal determinations of the bankruptcy court and employs the same standards of review as the district court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“review the bankruptcy court's findings of fact for clear error and its conclusions of law de novo.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.