Hill v. Crum’s Empirical Analysis
727 F.3d 312 · 2013
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1915A
Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Anderson v. Creighton · Pearson v. Callahan · Rochin v. People of California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the contours of the right [are] sufficiently clear that a reasonable officer would understand that what he is doing violates that right.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.