Obriecht v. Foster’s Empirical Analysis
727 F.3d 744 · 2013
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Holland v. Florida · Holland v. Florida · Fisher v. Johnson · Miller v. Runyon · Harper v. Vigilant Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“only if the illness in fact prevents the sufferer from managing his affairs and thus from understanding his legal rights and acting upon them.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“actually impaired his ability to pursue his claims”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“filed direct and collateral appeals in state court between 2003 and June 2005, the period during which he asserts that his mental health prevented him from seeking state review of his claims in this case”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Conroy v. Thompson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.