Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

727 F.3d 950

Docket Nos. 11-35127, 11-35128.

CGI Technologies & Solutions Inc. v. Rose

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Aug. 16, 2013.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2013-08-16

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Curley v. City of North Las Vegas (2014), National Ass'n for the Advancement of Multijurisdiction Practice v. Berch (2014)

7 federal appellate · 5 district ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on 133 S. Ct. 1537 - U.S. Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2013-08-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Noah G. Lipschultz, Littler Mendelson, P.C., Minneapolis, MN, Joanna M. Silver-stein, Leigh Ann Tift, Littler Mendelson, P.C., Seattle, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

¶2Leslie Agnes Brueckner, Public Justice, Oakland, CA, Michael E. Nelson, Esquire, Nelson Langer & Nelson, Michael Elwood Withey, Law Offices of Michael E. Withey, Seattle, WA, Caitlin S. Palacios, Esquire, Paulson & Nace, PLLC, Matthew W.H. Wessler, Public Justice, P.C., Washington, DC, Paul L. Stritmatter, Stritmatter Kessler Whelan Coluccio, Hoquiam, WA, for Defendants-Appellants.

¶3Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER and RONALD M. GOULD, Circuit Judges, and RALPH R. BEISTLINE, Chief District Judge.*

¶5ORDER

¶6We vacate the district court’s order and remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with US Airways, Inc. v. McCutchen, 569 U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 1537, 185 L.Ed.2d 654 (2013).

/727/f3d/950 · .json · Public domain