Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 727 FSUPP 744 - Magerer v. John Sexton & Co.

Magerer v. John Sexton & Co.’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
November 2007
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1441 · 29 U.S.C. § 185 (§ 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act))

Relies on Franchise Tax Board of the State of California v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern California · Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams · Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Taylor · Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. Lueck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““No employer or duly authorized agent of an employer shall discharge ... an employee because the employee has exercised a right afforded by this chapter .... Any person claiming to be aggrieved by a violation of this section may initiate proceedings in the superior court department of the trial court for the county in which the alleged violation occurred. An employer found to have violated this paragraph shall be exclusively liable to pay to the employee lost wages, shall grant the employee suitable employment, and shall reimburse such reasonable attorney fees incurred in the protection of rights granted as shall be determined by the court. The court may grant whatever equitable relief it deems necessary to protect rights granted by this section.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “whether or not the District Court erred in determining that the plaintiff did not state a valid common law claim for violation of public policy where the legislature has already provided for a remedy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “there is no evidence that [plaintiff] has grieved or arbitrated his claim under the grievance procedures of the [collective bargaining agreement].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.