Piercey v. Piercey’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
December 2010
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Crowl v. Berryhill · Adler v. Adler · Pitman v. Pitman · In Re the Marriage of Pulley · Shively v. Shively
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Our review is limited to considering the evidence and reasonable inferences drawn therefrom that support the trial court's judgment. Unless after a review of the entire record we have a firm and definite belief a mistake has been made by the trial court, the trial court's judgment will be affirmed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kicken v. Kicken
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.