Metropolitan Development Commission v. Schroeder’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
December 2006
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Itlhe facts found established that Schroeder had no actual knowledge of the terms of the variance; the variance was not recorded and was not revealed in the title search.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“for all intents and purposes a secret condition imposed upon Schroeder's use of his property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“public interest would be threatened by the government's conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.