State v. Tucker’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2001
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 30 Utah 2d 54 - State v. Valdez · State v. Schreuder · State v. Hutchison · State v. Bailey · State v. Tucker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A prosecutor's actions and remarks constitute misconduct that merits reversal if the actions or remarks call to the attention of the jurors matters they would not be justified in considering in determining their verdict and, under the cireumstances of the particular case, the error is substantial and prejudicial such that there is a reasonable likelihood that in its absence, there would have been a more favorable result for the defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Lafferty
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.