Rosenberg v. Smidt’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2022 · most notably Jones v. Flowers (2006), N.A. v. State (1996)
2 federal appellate · 22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 26 U.S.C. § 6212
Relies on Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. · Flagg Brothers Inc v. Brooks J Lefkowitz · Wuchter v. Pizzutti · Bradshaw v. Sea World, Inc · 39 Cal. 3d 281 - I. E. Associates v. Safeco Title Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“balance adequately the competing interests involved”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“not to the trustee's right to proceed with foreclosure but only to the mechanics of exercising the power”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Within 10 days after recording the notice of default, the trustee shall mail a copy of the notice by certified mail to the last known address of each of the following persons or their legal representatives (1) the grantor in the trust deed; (2) the successor in interest to the grantor whose interest appears of record or of whose interest the trustee or the beneficiary has actual notice, or who is in possession of the property; (3) any other person in possession of or occupying the property; (4) any person having a lien or interest subsequent to the interest of the trustee in the trust deed, where the lien or interest appears of record or where the trustee or the beneficiary has actual notice of the lien or interest....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.