Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

727 P.2d 965

Johnson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 20, 1986

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · decided 1986-10-20

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently April 2004

4 state decisions

Relies on Freeman v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1986-10-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

*971PARKS, Presiding Judge,

¶1specially concurring:

¶2I concur with the majority’s opinion that this conviction must be affirmed. However, I write separately to reiterate that we do not, in this opinion, approve of the prosecutor’s comments. These comments were not met with an objection at trial, and do not necessitate reversal. See Freeman v. State, 681 P.2d 84 (Okl.Cr.1984). In another case, one in which the comments did receive an appropriate objection and adverse ruling by the trial court, these comments might require reversal.

/727/p2d/965 · .json · Public domain