727 So. 2d 104 - Ex Parte Monroe’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2014
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 455 So. 2d 863 - Ex Parte McLendon · 676 So. 2d 1322 - Ex Parte Bryowsky · 400 Pa. Super. 174 - Gruber v. Gruber · 119 Ill. 2d 316 - In Re Marriage of Eckert · Ireland v. Ireland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The trial court analyzed testimony given by various experts, counselors, and family members and from that testimony determined that it was in the best interest of the child to stay in Alabama close to his father and to the child's very supportive extended families. We cannot say the trial judge's determination was clearly erroneous or against the great weight of the evidence; its judgment was not plainly and palpably wrong."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Korn v. Korn“`It is axiomatic that where the evidence has been [presented] ore tenus, a presumption of correctness attends the trial court's conclusions on issues of fact, and this Court will not disturb the trial court's conclusion unless it is clearly erroneous and against the great weight of the evidence....'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“`[i]n domestic relations cases a minor child has an inalienable right to the maximum protection of the judiciary.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hollon v. Williamson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.