727 So. 2d 1180 - State v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 1999
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Antoine
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To amend and reenact R.S. 32:215.1(F) and (G), relative to the required use of safety belts; to allow vehicles and occupants to be stopped or searched because of failure to wear a safety belt; to provide for a period of time in which warnings shall be issued; and to provide for related matters. (emphasis added)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Barbier“[n]o vehicle, the contents of the vehicle, driver, or passenger in a vehicle shall be inspected, detained, or searched solely because of a violation of this Section,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Barbier“or to determine compliance with this section”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. State v. Barbier
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.