Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 727 So. 2d 173 - Ex Parte Smith

727 So. 2d 173 - Ex Parte Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently April 2011 · most notably 791 So. 2d 979 - Jackson v. State (2000), Cunningham v. District Attorney's Office for Escambia County (2010)

1 federal appellate · 23 state decisions

150199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"In the prosecution of any felony case the trial court in its discretion may permit the jury hearing the case to separate during the pendency of the trial. The court may at any time on its own initiative or on motion of any party, require that the jury be sequestered under the charge of a proper officer whenever they leave the jury box or the court may allow them to separate. A motion to separate or sequester shall not be made within the hearing of the jury, and the jury shall not be informed which party, if any, requested separation or sequestration."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"In any prosecution for a capital felony, upon the consent in open court of the defendant, defendant's counsel, and the district attorney, the trial court, in its discretion, may permit the jury trying the case to separate during the pendency of the trial, whether the jury has retired or not."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.