Cave v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Enmund v. Florida · Tison v. Arizona · Schlossberg v. Maryland Comptroller of the Treasury · 283 So. 2d 1 - State v. Dixon · Webster v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Defendant personally removed the victim from the convenience store at gun point, placed her in the back seat of the car in which he and a co-defendant were seated, heard her pleas for her life during a fifteen to eighteen minute ride to an isolated area, removed her from the car and turned her over to Bush and Parker who stabbed and then shot her. At some point her panties were wet with urine. The terror she experienced must have been horrible and meets the definition of especially heinous, atrocious and cruel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“There was little reason for the men to kidnap Slater except to kill her at their leisure in isolated surroundings where they would not be surprised or observed; and there was no other reason to kill hershe was not shot accidently or in an escape attempt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Parker v. State“of the enormity of the crimes committed in this episode.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Cave v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.