Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 727 SO2D 68 - Taylor v. Hanner

Taylor v. Hanner’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 488 So. 2d 1357 - Hill v. Sherwood · 477 So. 2d 302 - Hines v. Armbrester · Rudolph v. Lindsay

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'One cannot reasonably argue that the Defendant would not have sought and been entitled to a directed verdict [now, a JML] in his favor had the Plaintiff failed to present substantial evidence of the statutorily defined breach of duty by the Defendant. Thus, the so-called level playing field that our system of justice must provide mandates [that] the Plaintiff [be] entitled to a 'partial [JML]' where the Defense fails to rebut a showing by the Plaintiff by substantial evidence that the Defendant breached his medico-legal duty to his patient, in this case, the Plaintiff's decedent.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.