727 So. 2d 753 - Lenox v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
February 2015
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 681 So. 2d 521 - Hoops v. State · 671 So. 2d 581 - Walker v. State · Peterson v. State · 508 So. 2d 1111 - Foster v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Absent unusual circumstances, where objection is sustained to improper questioning or testimony, and the jury is admonished to disregard the question or testimony, we will not find error. Where the [circuit] court sustained appellant’s objection and directed the jury to disregard the statement, it is presumed that jurors follow the instructions of the court so as to dissipate any prejudicial effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.