727 So. 2d 839 - Barnes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently March 2010
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · United States v. Young · 9221 Associates v. Industrial State Bank · Holm v. United States · Dill v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“number of law-enforcement officers to be seated in the courtroom was not an abuse of the trial court's discretion. No plain error occurred in this regard. VI. The appellant argues that the trial court committed reversible error in allowing the State, during the sentencing phase, to use a trial aid listing all eight statutory aggravating factors enumerated in § 13A-5-49 , Ala. Code 1975. For the first time, on appeal, he argues that the prosecutor's comment in his opening statement to the jury, during the sentencing phase, that evidence would be presented as to”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.