Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 728 F.2d 1141 - Schumann v. Levi

Schumann v. Levi’s Empirical Analysis

728 F.2d 1141 · 1984

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
September 2004
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 4 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently September 2004

4 federal appellate · 4 district ·

60198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1961 · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on The Weitz Company, Inc. v. Mo-Kan Carpet, Inc. · ICC Leasing Corp. v. Midwestern MacHinery Co. · Troutman v. Modlin · Charles Schmitt & Co. v. Barrett

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] trial court must grant the relief to which a prevailing party is entitled ... even though the party has not demanded it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “interest shall be allowed on any money judgment in a civil case recovered in a district court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.