Brooks v. Francis

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1984.

Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1984-03-15

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently February 1991

15 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Brooks v. Francis

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-03-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Stephen B. Bright, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner-appellant.

¶2Mary Beth Westmoreland, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee.

¶3ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

¶4Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RO-NEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

¶5BY THE COURT:

¶6A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶7IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.