Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 728 F.2d 1407 - Harmon v. Berry

Harmon v. Berry’s Empirical Analysis

728 F.2d 1407 · 1984

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
May 2019
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably Miller v. Leathers (1990), Dean v. Barber (1992)

21 federal appellate · 3 district ·

1901984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Haines v. Kerner · Bonner v. City of Prichard · Starnes v. Penrod Drilling Co. · Csaky v. Hornblower & Weeks-Hemphill, Noyes, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It is settled law that the allegations of [a pro se complaint filed by a state prisoner], 'however inartfully pleaded,' are held to 'less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “labelled him [plaintiff] a snitch and are exposing him to inmate retaliation”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.