Parker v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

728 F.2d 392 · 1984

Citation profile

cited by 37 later decisions

January 2003

most recently cited

27 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently January 2003 · most notably Prather v. Rees (1987), Sampson v. Love (1986)

27 federal appellate ·

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Wainwright v. Sykes · Fay v. Noia · Rose v. Lundy · Engle v. Isaac · Estelle v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“petitioners 'who clearly did not raise their claims for relief at the first opportunity, are entitled to seek post-conviction relief.’ ” The actual holding of the case, however, is that the petitioner’s claims were unexhausted, reflected in the speculative assertion that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Alley v. Bell
“Where there is no reason to believe that state judicial remedies would be unavailable, we are obliged to hold that petitioner's [constitutional] claims may not properly be considered on the merits for the first time in a federal habeas proceeding.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
e.g. O'Rane M. Cornish v. State of Tennessee
“an opportunity to examine the facts and pass on the validity of petitioner's federal constitutional claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. O'Rane M. Cornish v. State of Tennessee

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.