Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

728 F.2d 492

Docket No. 83-8244.

Davis v. Zant

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

March 6, 1984.

2 counsel of record

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 952

Relies on Glasser v. United States · Holland v. United States · United States v. Batencort

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1984-03-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently January 2012 · most notably United States v. Rivera (1991), McCleskey v. Kemp (1985)

26 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

1901984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Joseph M. Nursey, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner-appellant.

Susan V. Boleyn, William B. Hill, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia; G. Ernest Tidwell, Judge.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion December 27, 1983, 11th Cir., 1983, 721 F.2d 1478).

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

¶1

A member of this Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

¶2

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by this Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of en banc briefs.

/728/f2d/492 · .json · Public domain