Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 728 F.2d 593 - Microdot, Inc. v. United States

Microdot, Inc. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

728 F.2d 593 · 1984

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
October 2010
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 112 · 26 U.S.C. § 1232 · 26 U.S.C. § 163 · 26 U.S.C. § 354 · 26 U.S.C. § 368

Relies on New Colonial Ice Co. v. Helvering · Harris v. McRae · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. National Alfalfa Dehydrating and Milling Company · Cities Service Co. v. United States · Helvering v. Southwest Consolidated Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “While section 354(a)(2)(B) would have required a different result if it had been in effect when the cases were decided under the 1939 Code, it would have done so only insofar as the taxability of the exchange to the shareholders was involved. Section 354(a)(2)(B) does not purport to define recapitalization; indeed, the term is not mentioned. As stated above, the 1954 Code reenacted the 1939 Code definition of reorganization without change and without definition of recapitalization. We conclude that section 354(a)(2)(B) does not bear on the issue before us. * * * In short, contrary to Microdot’s arguments, the definition of reorganization, with its inclusion of recapitalization, does not incorporate any reference to the tax consequences of a transaction to the shareholders. Section 368(a)(1) is a definitional section, wholly distinct from section 354. [Fn. ref. omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In the case of a bond or other evidence of indebtedness, * * * (other than a bond or other evidence of indebtedness * * * issued pursuant to a plan of reorganization within the meaning of section 368(a)(1) * * *), which is issued for property and which— (A) is part of an issue a portion of which is traded on an established securities market, or (B) is issued for stock or securities which are traded on an established securities market, the issue price of such bond or other evidence of indebtedness or investment unit, as the case may be, shall be the fair market value of such property. Except in cases to which the preceding sentence applies, the issue price of a bond or other evidence of indebtedness * * * which is issued for property (other than money) shall be the stated redemption price at maturity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “"An exchange which is not pursuant to a reorganization * * * is an exchange in which the obligation or investment unit is not issued pursuant to a plan of reorganization within the meaning of section 368(aXD or pursuant to an insolvency reorganization within the meaning of section 371, 373, or 374. Thus, for example, no original issue discount is created on an obligation issued in a recapitalization within the meaning of section 368(aXlXE). * * *””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.