Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 728 F.2d 860 - Rohrer, Hibler & Replogle, Inc. v. Perkins

Rohrer, Hibler & Replogle, Inc. v. Perkins’s Empirical Analysis

728 F.2d 860 · 1984

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
June 2007
most recently cited

22 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2007 · most notably Lauro Lines S.R.L. v. Chasser (1989), United States v. Horak (1987)

22 federal appellate ·

260198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1293

Relies on Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay · M/s Bremen v. Zapata off-Shore Company · Catlin v. United States · Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. Risjord

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “which finally determine claims of right separable from, and collateral to, rights asserted in the action, too important to be denied review and too independent of the cause itself to require that appellate consideration be deferred until the whole case is adjudicated.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “An order denying a motion to remand a case to state court cannot, by any stretch of the imagination be considered 'final' within the meaning of Sec. 1291”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “granting, continuing, modifying, refusing or dissolving injunctions, or refusing to dissolve or modify injunctions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.