Heard v. Addison’s Empirical Analysis
728 F.3d 1170 · 2013
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hill v. Lockhart · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Kolender v. Lawson · Padilla v. Kentucky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We do not reach [the petitioner's argument] in this case, however, because ... we conclude that [the petitioner] never raised such a claim, in his petition or otherwise, before the federal district court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'is obligated to research relevant law to make an informed decision whether certain avenues will prove fruitful.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Dinkel“obvious, nonfrivolous grounds for appeal”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Smith v. Allbaugh
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.