Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 728 F.3d 1239 - Ingram v. Faruque

Ingram v. Faruque’s Empirical Analysis

728 F.3d 1239 · 2013

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
January 2023
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2680 · 38 U.S.C. § 7316 · 42 U.S.C. § 233 (Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009)

Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Davis v. Passman · Carlson v. Green · Bush v. Lucas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “injury or loss of property, or personal injury or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Government while acting within the scope of his office or employment, under circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a health care employee of the Administration in furnishing health care or treatment while in the exercise of that employee's duties in or for the Administration.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Although 28 U.S.C. § 2680 (h) specifically excludes claims for intentional torts, including battery, from the sovereign immunity waiver effected by the FTCA, '§ 2680(h) does not bar application of the FTCA to tort claims arising out of the conduct of VA medical personnel within the scope of' what is now designated as 38 U.S.C. § 7316 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.