Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 728 F.3d 592 - Seaton v. TripAdvisor LLC

Seaton v. TripAdvisor LLC’s Empirical Analysis

728 F.3d 592 · 2013

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
4
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 47 U.S.C. § 230 (Communications Decency Act § 230)

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co. · Old Dominion Branch No. 496 v. Austin · Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “recording, rather than a recording that was always known to exist but that had never been released for legal and/or business reasons. The defendants argue that Montgomery has failed to state a claim for false light invasion of privacy because (1) he has failed to identify any statements that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person and (2) he has failed to plead damages. With regard to the characterization of the album as”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “We review de novo ... the district court's grant of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.