Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 728 F.3d 682 - Holtzman v. Turza

Holtzman v. Turza’s Empirical Analysis

728 F.3d 682 · 2013

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
2
states following
January 2023
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 5 district · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 47 U.S.C. § 227

Relies on Zahn v. International Paper Co. · Boeing Co. v. Van Gemert · Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc. · Lincoln v. Vigil · 133 S. Ct. 1426 - Comcast Corp. v. Behrend

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any material advertising the commercial availability or quality of any property, goods, or services which is transmitted to any person without that person's prior express invitation or permission, in writing or otherwise.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “to a group that will use the money for the benefit of class members.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “no reasonable juror could conclude that these data are inaccurate.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.