United States v. Perlitz’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1071 · 18 U.S.C. § 1546 · 18 U.S.C. § 2423 (White-Slave Traffic Act of 1910 (Mann Act)) · 18 U.S.C. § 3237 · 18 U.S.C. § 3238 · 21 U.S.C. § 331 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 451
Relies on United States, v. Jacinto Rodriguez-Moreno · Skilling v. United States · United States v. Cabrales · United States v. Polizzi · United States v. Pepe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“all offenses begun or committed upon the high seas, or elsewhere out of the jurisdiction of any particular State or district ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“in the district in which the offender ... is arrested or first brought”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.