Adkisson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
May 2014
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Payton v. New York · United States v. Santana · United States v. Berkowitz · Jordan v. State · Casselman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Opening the door to ascertain the purpose of an interruption to the private enjoyment of the home is not an invitation to enter, but rather is a common courtesy of civilized society. Attendant to this courtesy is the ability to exclude those who are knocking and preserve the integrity of the physical boundaries of the home.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[Where the arrest is attempted by means of a forceful and unlawful entry into a citizen's home, such entry represents the use of excessive force and the arrest cannot be considered peaceable. Therefore, a citizen has the right to reasonably resist the unlawful entry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Barnes v. State“'The war-rantless arrest of a person in his or her home requires both probable cause and 'exigent cireumstances ... that make it impracticable to obtain a warrant first.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.