Harrell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 10, 1999

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-02-10

Relies on 491 So. 2d 1129 - State v. DiGuilio · 390 So. 2d 341 - Grant v. State · 705 So. 2d 676 - State v. Cortez

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-02-10

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2018

9 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We find no merit in the appellant’s argument that the show-up identification was defective. See Grant v. State, 390 So.2d 341 (Fla.1980). Notwithstanding the appellant’s argument to the contrary, the state’s evidence prior to the show-up identification was clearly sufficient to establish probable cause in support of the appellant’s arrest so that even if we were to find merit in the appellant’s argument, it would not taint the rest of the state’s evidence. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). See also State v. Cortez, 705 So.2d 676 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

¶2Affirmed.