Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

728 So. 2d 321

Looney v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 26, 1999

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-02-26

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 2000

1 state decisions

Relies on 714 So. 2d 440 - White v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-02-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Steven Looney challenges his sentence for carrying a concealed firearm. He correctly contends that it was error for the trial court to assess eighteen additional sentencing points for possessing a firearm where the underlying crime was carrying a concealed firearm. See White v. State, 714 So.2d 440 (Fla.1998). The State concedes error but contends that it is harmless error because Looney’s sentence, with a corrected score-sheet, would be unchanged. Although we agree with the State that the sentence Looney is now serving would not change, the scoresheet error could affect a subsequent sentence should Looney violate his probation. Accordingly, we remand with instructions to the trial court to correct the scoresheet.

¶2Sentence affirmed; remanded with instructions to correct the scoresheet.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and BLUE and FULMER, JJ., Concur.
/728/so2d/321 · .json · Public domain