Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

728 So. 2d 341

R.E.P. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-03-12

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently July 2001

7 state decisions

Relies on Glaubius v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-03-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Appellant appeals an order imposing restitution. An order of restitution must be “causally connected to the offense and bear[ ] a significant relationship to the offense.” See Glaubius v. State, 688 So.2d 913, 915 (Fla.1997). Based on the present record, appellant may be held accountable, jointly and severally with his co-defendants, in restitution for the loss of five unrecovered stolen guns. He also may be held accountable jointly and severally for the amount of the reward, as he waived that issue below.

¶2REVERSED and REMANDED for further consistent proceedings.

JOANOS, MINER and DAVIS, JJ., CONCUR.
/728/so2d/341 · .json · Public domain