728 So. 2d 650 - Robinson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2013
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Roviaro v. United States · Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. American Train Dispatchers Ass'n · Benjamin v. Brown · Jones v. State · United States v. Herrero
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`The weight and probative value to be given to the evidence, the credibility of the witnesses, the resolution of conflicting testimony, and inferences to be drawn from the evidence are for the jury. . . . A defendant's guilt may be established by circumstantial evidence as well as by direct evidence.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““[I]t was improper for defense counsel to call [the accomplice] as a witness, knowing that [the accomplice] planned to invoke the Fifth Amendment. This was an apparent attempt to have the jury infer [the accomplices’s] guilt from his assertion of rights.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Boyle v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.