728 So. 2d 779 - Green v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently August 2017
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Anderson · Lacros v. State · 684 So. 2d 189 - Gaber v. State · 397 So. 2d 288 - Hoffman v. State · 715 So. 2d 960 - Hyden v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We agree that the key to whether it is error to permit amendment during trial is whether the defendant is thereby prejudiced.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“allow[ing] the jury to find [him] guilty of the crime of battery on Deputy Gore, a crime for which he had not been charged and for which he was not on trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]his was not simply an amendment which merely clarified or corrected a simple misnomer, nor was it a case of simply correcting the name of the victim where only a single officer was involved and no one, including the defendant, rea sonably could have been misled as to the identity of the victim. We agree with [the defendant] that permitting the amendment was harmful error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.