Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 728 SW2D 360 - Martinez v. State

Martinez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently November 2018

12 state decisions

501987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bates v. State · Shipman v. State · Hammett v. State · Baxter v. State · Ex Parte Carter

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen a defendant voluntarily testifies as to his prior criminal record without any prompting or maneuvering on the part of the State’s attorney and in so doing he leaves a false impression with the jury, the State is allowed to correct that false impression by introducing evidence of the defendant’s prior criminal record.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.