Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 728 SW2D 756 - State v. Candler

State v. Candler’s Empirical Analysis

1986

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
September 1996
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on DeFord v. National Life & Accident Ins. · Ex Parte Sanders · Jones v. State · Smith v. Mercantile Bank · Griffith Motors, Inc. v. Parker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The rule imputing an agent’s knowledge to the principal is designed to protect only those who exercise good faith and is not intended to serve as a shield for unfair dealing by the third person. The rule may not be invoked where third persons use the agent to further their own frauds upon the principal, or where the third person did not intend or expect that the agent would communicate the facts or the truth to the principal as where the third person colludes with the agent in acting adversely to the principal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.