Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 729 A2D 300 - HMG/Courtland Properties, Inc. v. Gray

HMG/Courtland Properties, Inc. v. Gray’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2016
most recently cited

3 district · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Shaffer v. Heitner · Mellon Bank (East) Psfs, National Association v. Kenneth v. Farino Leslie Trinin Robert Levitas Eileen Michaels · Zaist v. Olson · Sternberg v. O'NEIL · 772 F. Supp. 1458 - Applied Biosystems, Inc. v. Cruachem, Ltd.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he power of defendant directors to act in their director capacity arises exclusively under the Delaware corporation laws; defendant directors avail themselves of important privileges and legal powers and protections when they accept office as directors of Delaware corporations; by virtue of § 3114, defendant directors who accept such privileges are put on notice that they can be haled into court here to answer for breaches of Delaware corporation laws; Delaware has a legitimate interest in enforcing those laws; § 3114 is narrowly tailored to serve that legitimate interest and to compel the appearance of defendant directors only where that purpose is served; that the state’s legitimate interest outweighs any burden to defendant directors; and, as a result, defendant directors served in conformity with § 3114 can fairly be expected to defend suits here.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “1) whether the [foreign] defendant over whom jurisdiction is sought has no real corporate identity from a defendant over whom jurisdiction is clear ...; 2) the existence of acts in [the forum] which can be fairly imputed to the [foreign] defendant and which satisfy the [state’s] long-arm statute and/or federal due process requirements.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.