Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 729 F.2d 1013 - National Labor Relations Board v. Trailways, Inc.

National Labor Relations Board v. Trailways, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

729 F.2d 1013 · 1984

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
March 2015
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2015

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

901984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co. · Republic Aviation Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board · National Labor Relations Board v. United Steelworkers of America · National Labor Relations Board v. Scrivener · Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he imposition of prospective fines is an extraordinary remedy to be imposed only where violations have been flagrant and lesser remedies appear to fail.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “An act does not cease to be a violation of a law and of a decree merely because it may have been done innocently.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “sanctions imposed ... are to be adapted to the particular circumstances of each case”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.