United States v. Kellerman’s Empirical Analysis
729 F.2d 281 · 1984
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3731 · 18 U.S.C. § 656
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Mullaney v. Wilbur · United States v. DiFrancesco · California State Board of Equalization v. Western Marina Corp. · ITT Continental Baking Co. v. William Inglis & Sons Baking Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to be a holder, the [instrument] must have been negotiated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“only a holder can be a holder in due course,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.