Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 729 F.2d 35 - O'Neill Pr v. Nestle Libbys Pr Inc

O'Neill Pr v. Nestle Libbys Pr Inc’s Empirical Analysis

729 F.2d 35 · 1984

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 2010
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 6 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2010 · most notably Barnhill v. Johnson (1992), Waldschmidt v. Ranier (1989)

14 federal appellate · 6 district ·

4501984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 547

Relies on Fortin v. Marshall · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Estate of Ellis Branson Ridgway, Deceased, Craig Sawyer Ridgway and Ellis Branson Ridgway, Jr., Executors · Engstrom v. Wiley · Shamrock Golf Company v. Richcraft Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “by insulating normal business transactions from the trustee's avoidance power.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is to leave undisturbed normal financial relations, because it does not detract from the general policy of the preference section to discourage unusual action by either the debtor or his creditors during the debtor's slide into bankruptcy.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the 30-day period deemed reasonable under the U.C.C.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.